G. Heileman Brewing Co. v. Peimeisl
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Le Sueur county by plaintiff, a foreign corporation doing business in said county, to recover $195.-50 and interest for goods sold therein. The case was tried upon stipulated facts before Cadwell, J., who made an order dismissing the action. From an order denying a motion for a new trial, plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
Action to recover for beer sold by the plaintiff to the defendant. The complaint alleged that the plaintiff was a corporation created and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the state of Wisconsin, and duly licensed to sell beer in the city of Waterville, this state; that at divers times between June 30,1897, and June 1, 1900, it sold and delivered beer to the defendant, at such city, for which he promised to pay the sum of $3,552.40, but has not paid therefor, except the sum of $3,356.90, leaving a balance unpaid of $195.50. The answer admitted that the plaintiff was a foreign…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cary-Lombard Lumber Co. v. ThomasTennessee Supreme Court · 1893
- First Division of the St. Paul & Pacific Rail Road v. ParcherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1869
- Carson-Rand Co. v. SternSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
- Ehrhardt v. Robertson Bros.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1899
- J. Walter Thompson Co. v. WhitehedIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Butler Bros. Shoe Co. v. United States Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
- Dunlop v. MercerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
- National Fertilizer Co. v. Fall River Five Cents Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Oliver Co. v. Louisville Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
- Inn Operations, Inc. v. River Hills Motor Inn Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1967
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.