Legal Opinion

Interstate Finance Corp. v. Dunphy

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1941PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWickhem, J.

The facts in this case are not in serious dispute. Plaintiff is a corporation engaged in business of discounting conditional sales contracts on automobiles and loaning money with automobiles as security. In April, 1938, plaintiff bought from Philip Doheny, automobile dealer in Janesville, a conditional sales contract on a Hudson automobile, Doheny being the vendor and defendant the vendee. There being default in the payment of instalments upon this contract a conference was had between plaintiff and Doheny, and it was disclosed to plaintiff that defendant had fully paid for the car, and that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Duncan v. DuncanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Jansen v. HuerthWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Schmoldt v. LoperWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Grimh v. Western Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Brown v. SucherWisconsin Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Grimh v. Western Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API