Legal Opinion

Grimh v. Western Fire Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1958PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

Defendant contends that the casualty to plaintiff’s tractor was not an upset or overturn, considering *87that those terms are defined in its insurance policy by the phrase: “(Meaning a complete overbalancing of . . . machines).”

Dictionary definitions of “upset” and “overturn” are not very helpful. Webster’s New International Dictionary (2d ed.), defines each of those terms by reference to the other. The verb “overbalance” is defined as “To cause to lose balance or equilibrium.” The noun “equilibrium” is defined, in so far as material, as “Phys. Science. A state of balance between opposing forces…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bell v. American Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Jack v. Standard Marine InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Duncan v. DuncanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Jansen v. HuerthWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Schmoldt v. LoperWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. McFarrenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Dittman v. NagelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Reed v. Commercial InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  4. State Ex Rel. Skibinski v. TadychWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Moonen v. MoonenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API