Legal Opinion

Brown v. Sucher

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1950PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

The decision in the circuit court recognizes the purpose of the law with relation to labor disputes, and in accordance with that law protects the interests of the proprietor of a business operated by himself and so conducted that at the time there was neither a labor dispute nor room for one. The court had jurisdiction of the subject matter and jurisdiction of the parties, who appeared and submitted their defense on affidavits. Servi v. Draheim, 254 Wis. 356, 36 N. W. (2d) 273. The sufficiency of the pleadings was not challenged below, and the question submitted, as appears from the record,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. HankeSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Dietz v. City of NeenahWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Senn v. Tile Layers Protective Union, Local No. 5Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Nickel v. Theresa Farmers Co-Operative Asso.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Townsend v. La Crosse Trailer Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1950

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pure Milk Products Cooperative v. National Farmers OrganizationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  2. US PIPE, ETC. v. United Steelworkers of Am.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  3. Laundry, Dry Cleaning, Dye House Workers Union, Local 3008 v. Laundry Workers International UnionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Vastola v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, Local 268California Court of Appeal · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API