Douglas A. Scott v. PerkinElmer Health Sciences, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 DOUGLAS A. SCOTT, Case No. 24-cv-03389-SVK 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 9 v. DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S RULE 60(b) MOTION FOR RELIEF 10 PERKINELMER HEALTH SCIENCES, FROM FINAL JUDGMENT INC., 11 Re: Dkt. No. 31 Defendant. 12 13 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Relief from Final Judgment Pursuant to Federal 14 Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). Dkt. 31 (the “Motion”). Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the 15 Court determines that the Motion is suitable for decision without oral argument. Civil L.R.…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Sinochem International Co. v. Malaysia International Shipping Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.