Davenport v. Pope
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtFelton, C. J.
An action for quantum meruit cannot by amendment, either by pleading or by evidence unobjected to, be converted into one on an express contract. Kraft v. Rowland & Rowland, 33 Ga. App. 806, 808 (128 S. E. 812). For the same reason recovery cannot be had on an express contract in an action predicated on quantum meruit. Thus, where the plaintiff sues on quantum meruit for the reasonable value of services rendered, but her evidence conclusively shows that, if she was entitled to recover, she was entitled to a five percent commission on a definite sum, a verdict is demanded for the defendant.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Kraft v. Rowland & RowlandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
3Cited by5 opinions
- Brannen v. LanierCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
- Adair Realty Co. v. WellmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Wofac Corp. v. HansonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Norwood v. RobieCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
- Orkin Exterminating Co. v. Evans Implement Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1974