Wofac Corp. v. Hanson
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Stolz, Judge.
"There cannot be an express and implied contract for the same thing existing at the same time between the same parties. It is only when the parties themselves do not expressly agree, that the law interposes and raises a promise; and no agreement can be implied where there is an express one existing.” Ramsey v. Langley, 86 Ga. App. 544, 549 (4) (71 SE2d 863). See also Davenport v. Pope, 96 Ga. App. 799 (101 SE2d 614). The evidence here conclusively shows that the plaintiffs right to recovery, if any, of commissions for contracts closed after his termination depends upon an express…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chandler v. GatelyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- Ramsey v. LangleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
- Kenney v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- Sachs v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
- Davenport v. PopeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Doxie v. Ford Motor Credit Co.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1984
- Thomas R. Dumas v. First Federal Savings and Loan Association D/B/A Savannah First FederalCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- Perimeter Mall, Inc. v. Retail Sense, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- Ellzey Realty Co. v. Hugo, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- Shore v. LoomisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988