Brannen v. Lanier
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Felton, Chief Judge.
1. Where a plaintiff sues on a special or express contract he cannot recover on a quantum meruit. Baldwin v. Lessner, 8 Ga. 71; Alford v. Davis, 21 Ga. App. 820 (4 c) (95 S. E. 313); Shropshire v. Heard, 27 Ga. App. 256 (107 S. E. 892); Seaboard Air-Line Ry. Co. v. Henderson Lumber Co., 28 Ga. App. 391 (111 S. E. 220). Therefore, the court erred in its charge in authorizing the jury to return a verdict for the plaintiff based on quantum meruit where the plaintiff sued on an express contract in the amount of $822.89, introduced evidence to prove his allegation, and where…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kraft v. Rowland & RowlandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
- Cooper v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
- Alford v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
- Seaboard Air-Line Railway Co. v. Henderson Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
- Shropshire v. HeardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Farmers Warehouse of Pelham, Inc. v. CollinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1964
- Classic Restorations, Inc. v. BeanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- Willis v. KempCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- MILLICAN ELECTRIC CO. INC. v. FisherCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
- One Bluff Drive, LLC v. K. A. P., Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.