Legal Opinion

Southern Railway Co. v. Mauzy

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided November 22, 1900PublishedCited by 34 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of Rockingham ■county, rendered October 25, 1899, in an action of trespass on the case, wherein the defendant in error was the plaintiff, and the plaintiff in error was the defendant.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

This action was brought by Clarence H. Mauzy against the Southern Railway' Company to recover damages for injuries alleged to have been sustained by him in consequence of the negligence of the defendant company. At the time of the accident in question, the plaintiff was an employee of the defendant, and was assisting other laborers in loading car-wheels upon a flat-car. The gravamen of the plaintiff’s complaint is that the defendant negligently failed to provide safe and adequate appliances for doing the work in the usual and most approved method.

The court is of opinion that it was error to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bertha Zinc Co. v. Martin's Adm'rSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
  2. Richmond Locomotive Works v. FordSupreme Court of Virginia · 1897
  3. Norfolk & Western Railroad v. Nuckol's Adm'rSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
  4. Jackson v. Norfolk & W. R.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Hanriot v. SherwoodSupreme Court of Virginia · 1884

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Hurley v. BennettSupreme Court of Virginia · 1934
  2. Strawderman v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1959
  3. Adams v. RistineSupreme Court of Virginia · 1924
  4. Southern Railway Co. v. Hansbrough's AdministratrixSupreme Court of Virginia · 1908
  5. Ramsey v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1958

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API