Hurley v. Bennett
Supreme Court of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
Hudgins, J.,
delivered the opinion of the court. •
On the threshold of this appeal, we are met with a motion to dismiss, based on two grounds: first, because the appeal bond was not completed within the six months required by statute; second, because the “bond is not in proper form.”
The last amendment adopted in 1932 to subsection 8 of section 5 of the Code (Acts 1932, ch. 31), provides that in computing time, the day on which the event or judgment occurred shall be excluded. The final decree, from which this appeal was obtained, was entered, on April 24, 1933. Hence, the six months period did…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Arwood v. Hill's AdministratorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1923
- Southern Railway Co. v. MauzySupreme Court of Virginia · 1900
- Richardson v. GardnerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1920
- Downing v. Huston, Darbee Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1927
- Nagle v. SyerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1928
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Horton v. HortonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1997
- Christopher Farrell v. Warren County Department of Social ServicesCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2012
- Mathews v. PHH Mortg. Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2012
- Countryside Orthopaedics, P.C. v. PeytonSupreme Court of Virginia · 2001
- Commonwealth v. ProffittSupreme Court of Virginia · 2016
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.