Legal Opinion

Carlson v. Dixon

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1913PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of tbe circuit court for Milwaukee county: E. R. BelbeN, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtBaeNes, J.

Tbe plaintiff claims that in July, 1903, be loaned -tbe defendant $1,000, taking as collateral security bonds of tbe Milwaukee Granite Company of tbe par value of $1,000. Stock in tbe same company to a like amount was delivered witb tbe-bonds, and it does not very clearly appear from plaintiff’s evidence'whether the stock was intended as security or as a gift or a bonus. This action is brought to foreclose tbe pledge and for a deficiency judgment.

Tbe defendant claims that be was a broker engaged in sell*64ing bonds, among others those of the Granite Company, and that he sold the bonds outright…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Beveridge v. BaerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Eberhardt v. RandallWisconsin Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Goodman v. Brown Land & Lumber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Metropolitan National Bank v. BolducSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  5. Schiltz v. WokalSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API