Beveridge v. Baer
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRudolph, J.
The plaintiff is the owner of real property together with a structure thereon located in the city of Sioux Falls. The structure on this property was assessed in 1931, by the local assessor, at the value of $15,100. At the meeting of the city board of equalization of Sioux Falls, O. S. Thompson, Carl Nielson, and Joseph E. Johnson, all taxpayers of Minnehaha County, personally, “and as a Tax 'Committee of Minnehaha County Farm Bureau,” appeared and protested that the plaintiff’s property had been undervalued by the assessor. The city equalization board ma'd'e no change in.the valuation,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bi-Metallic Investment Co. v. State Board of EqualizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Kuntz v. SumptionIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Meade v. Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
- People ex rel. Bracher v. OrvisIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
- State ex rel. Frich v. Stark CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1905
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- City of Arlington v. CannonTexas Supreme Court · 1954
- Bd. of Sup'rs of Linn Cty. v. Dept. of RevenueSupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
- Trellsite Foundry & Stamping Co. v. Enterprise FoundryMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
- Yuma County v. Arizona Edison Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1947
- State v. DoveSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.