Legal Opinion

Schiltz v. Wokal

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 24, 1942No. 35,372Published

1Opinion of the Court

*679The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, J.:

This was an action to determine the balance due on a promissory note and to foreclose á mortgage given to secure it. The defense was the five-year statute of limitations. (G. S. 1935, 60-306, First.) A trial by the court resulted in a judgment and decree for plaintiff. Defendants have appealed.

On April' 1, 1932, Charles Wokal executed a note to the Farmers State Bank at Clay Center for $3,600, due January 14, 1934, and secured the same by a mortgage on four pieces of real property known in the record as tracts A, B, C and D, being a first…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Good v. EhrlichSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  2. Credit Service Corp. v. BarkerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  3. Citizens Bank v. North End State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  4. Zaks v. ElliottCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1939
  5. James v. WingateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API