Legal Opinion

Chmieleski v. City Products Corp.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 20, 1983No. WD 32660PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANFORD, Judge.

This is a civil action presented upon a third amended petition containing five counts. Count I was for damages resulting from an alleged conspiracy to breach a lease. Count II sought recovery of capital and labor investment allegedly lost as a result of the refusal to renew a franchise agreement. Count II was abandoned prior to trial. Count III sought damages resulting from an alleged breach of a fiduciary duty. Count IV sought damages resulting from an alleged breach of a written franchise agreement. Count V sought damages for alleged fraud. Count V was dismissed voluntarily…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. American Tobacco Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Coonis v. RogersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  3. Mills v. MurrayMissouri Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. Grissum v. ReesmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
  5. Labor Discount Center, Inc. v. State Bank & Trust Co. of WellstonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Community Title Co. v. Roosevelt Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
  2. Emerick v. Mutual Benefit Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1988
  3. United States v. Conservation Chemical Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1986
  4. Oak Bluff Partners, Inc. v. MeyerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1999
  5. Postal Instant Press, Inc. v. SealyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API