Legal Opinion

Brooks v. City of Gilroy

California Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1934No. Docket No. S.F. 14933PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

This action was instituted by the plaintiff against the City of Gilroy upon a claim assigned to him by Charles E. Sloan to recover for services as an engineer, alleged to have been performed by Sloan for said city in connection with certain street improvements which the City of Gilroy planned to construct in said city. There is no conflict in the evidence as to the rendition of the services by ■Sloan or as to their reasonable value. Upon these issues the court found in favor of the plaintiff, and rendered judgment in his favor for the sum of $11,621.12. From this judgment, the defendant city…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kennedy v. City of GustineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Housing Authority v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Pockman v. LeonardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Lavine v. JessupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. Cotta v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  5. Raisch v. Sanitary Dist. No. 1 of Marin CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API