Legal Opinion

Hill v. State Highway Commission

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1973No. 9676PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MARTINEZ, Justice.

Appellees brought this action in the District Court of Bernalillo County on December 2, 1969 to recover damages by way of inverse condemnation pursuant to § 22-9-22, N.M.S.A.1953 (Supp.1971). Appellees alleged that appellant’s construction of a portion of Interstate 40 created a detour and interfered with their right of access which damaged their curio shop, service station, snake house, cafe, garage and two residential buildings. Because of this, they claimed that their businesses had to be closed and the value of their property diminished.

The trial court found that,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Board of County Com'rs v. SlaughterNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Board of County Com'rs, Lincoln County v. HarrisNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Kaiser Steel Corporation v. WS Ranch CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
  4. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. DanfelserNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  5. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. SilvaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Primetime Hospitality, Inc. v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State Ex Rel. State Highway Department v. Kistler-Collister Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Brannock v. The Lotus FundNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. Brannock v. The Lotus FundNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. City of Albuquerque v. Tecolote Res.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API