Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. Silva

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1962No. 6958PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NOBLE, Justice.

The action was in declaratory judgment to determine whether defendants suffered a compensable damage to their property by reason of a highway improvement.

It should be noted that none of defendants’ property was appropriated, nor was there any change of grade on the road in front of their property.

U. S. 85, south of Belen, New Mexico, on which defendants’ property abutted, was the principal north-south highway over which all through traffic flowed. Interstate 25, a new, controlled-access highway, was constructed on a new location roughly parallel and to the west of U. S. 85.…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Bacich v. Board of ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Warren v. Iowa State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1958
  3. In re Melon StreetSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
  4. Jones Beach Boulevard Estate, Inc. v. MosesNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
  5. Wine v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Breidert v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Hendrickson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  3. Wofford v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  4. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. LavasekNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Bare v. Department of HighwaysIdaho Supreme Court · 1965

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API