Legal Opinion

Brannock v. The Lotus Fund

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided December 29, 2015No. S-1-SC-35728; Docket 33,950PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BUSTAMANTE, Judge.

{1} Defendants The Lotus Fund (LF), Christine Hough Smith, and Christopher Smith appeal from the district court’s findings of facts and conclusions of law entering judgment 1 on behalf of Plaintiffs Ann Brannock, Daniel M. Mowery, and Marsha J. Mowery. On appeal, Defendants raise both issue and claim preclusion arguments and contend that, in any event, the district court erred in concluding that Plaintiffs proved the elements of prescriptive easement and easement by necessity. Concluding that the prior case does not have preclusive effect over the present case and…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Headley v. Morgan Management Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. New Mexico Right to Choose/NARAL v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Shovelin v. Central New Mexico Electric Cooperative, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Las Cruces Professional Fire Fighters & International Ass'n of Fire Fighters v. City of Las CrucesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Deflon v. SawyersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2006

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Brannock v. The Lotus FundNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API