Legal Opinion
Pinero v. SPECIALTY RESTAURANTS CORP.
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 22, 2005No. B177111PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BOLAND, J.
Appellant Alberto Pinero sued his former employer, respondent Specialty Restaurants Corporation (SRC), for retaliation. Pinero claimed that SRC forced him to resign after learning Pinero had filed an age discrimination action against another former employer, who also was a city council member in a city where SRC conducted business. Following the presentation of Pinero’s case-in-chief at trial, SRC moved for nonsuit when Pinero rested. The trial court found Pinero did not establish he was subjected to any form of adverse employment action, and granted the motion. We affirm.
FACT…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Patricia A. Brooks v. City of San Mateo, a Municipal Order and Corporation San Mateo Police Department John Stangl, Chief of Police Steven SelvaggioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- William J. Ray v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Brown, Regina C. v. Brody, Kenneth D.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- McRae v. Department of Corrections & RehabilitationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Light v. Cal. Dep't of Parks & Recreation, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Stonegate Homeowners Ass'n v. StabenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Coronado v. Cobblestone Village Community Rentals, L.P.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- Lewis v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.