Legal Opinion
McRae v. Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 29, 2006No. A098073, A100745, A104701, A098330, A098910PublishedCited by 65 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
STEIN, Acting P. J.
Dr. Margie McRae filed suit against her employer, the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (the Department) and four individual defendants, seeking damages for discrimination and retaliation in violation of the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) (Gov. Code, § 12900 et seq.).
The trial court granted summary judgment to the four individual defendants, and Dr. McRae appeals from an order awarding these defendants their costs. (Case Nos. A098330 & A098910.) The case proceeded to trial against the Department. The jury returned a verdict…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Patricia A. Brooks v. City of San Mateo, a Municipal Order and Corporation San Mateo Police Department John Stangl, Chief of Police Steven SelvaggioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Brown, Regina C. v. Brody, Kenneth D.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Loggins v. Kaiser Permanente InternationalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Light v. Cal. Dep't of Parks & Recreation, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Jose Flores v. City of WestminsterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Day v. Sears Holdings Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2013
- McCoy v. Pacific Maritime Asso.California Court of Appeal · 2013
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.