Carlin v. Masten
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.
The interveners in this action had judgment, from which judgment the plaintiff appeals.
The action was begun by the plaintiff against C. E. Hasten and James A. Long, doing business as copartners, to recover the sum of $732.57 alleged to be due from said defendants to the plaintiff. Following the filing of the complaint a writ of attachment was issued under and by virtue of which the sum of $558.59, theretofore deposited by C. E. Hasten in the Savings Bank of Sutter County, was garnisheed by service of said writ and notice upon said bank. The interveners thereupon filed a third party claim with…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Newport v. HattonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Lathrop v. BamptonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Title Ins. and Trust Co. v. IngersollCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Elizalde v. ElizaldeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Estate of ArmsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Takahashi v. KunishimaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Bloom v. WaxmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Marxen v. HerronCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933