Legal Opinion

Thayer v. Holland

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided May 15, 1882PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Motion for an allowance. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoesen, J.

The complaint was dismissed, and the defendant is the prevailing party as to the cause of action which constituted plaintiff’s claim. The right of defendant to recover costs follows as a matter of course. *188The plaintiff insists, however, that he is entitled to costs against defendant, inasmuch as no recovery was had upon the counter-claim, and that the costs that follow the dismissal of the complaint should be offset against the costs that ought, as he contends, to be awarded to him upon the dismissal of the counter-claim. The counter-claim was withdrawn, not dismissed; but even if there had…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kalt v. LignotNew York Supreme Court · 1856
  2. Crane v. HolcombNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1858

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Whitelegge v. De WittNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1884
  2. Graybill v. Van DyneNew York Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Rohrs v. RohrsCity of New York Municipal Court · 1911
  4. Ury v. WildeThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1888
  5. Ury v. WildThe Superior Court of New York City · 1888

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API