Legal Opinion
Graybill v. Van Dyne
New York Supreme Court
Decided August 10, 1971PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJames H. Boomer, J.
This motion poses a seemingly simple question concerning the right to costs where the jury verdict was rendered against the plaintiffs on their complaint and against a defendant on her counterclaim.
The plaintiffs sued for damages for personal injuries arising out of an automobile accident and the defendant Karen Van Dyne counterclaimed for damages for injuries she received in the same accident. The jury rendered a verdict for no cause for action on the plaintiffs’ cause of action against the defendant; and for no cause for action on the counterclaim of the defendant Karen Van Dyne against the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Checketts v. CollingsUtah Supreme Court · 1931
- Kriser v. RodgersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
- Dunne v. New York Telephone Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1919
- Hansen v. LevyAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1930
- Gibbons v. SkinnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ziankoski v. SimmonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Tarquini v. Taylor Rental CenterNew York Supreme Court · 1982
- Michaels v. CooperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Purcell v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 2009