Legal Opinion

Rohrs v. Rohrs

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided May 15, 1911PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Order to show cause why an order should not be made to review the action of the clerk of the court in refusing to allow and tax certain costs.

1Opinion of the CourtFinelite, J.

This motion was referred to me for disposition. The plaintiff obtained an order to show cause from one of the justices of this court, made returnable at a Special Term thereof, why an order should not be made therein reviewing the action of the clerk of this court in refusing, to allow and tax costs in favor of the plaintiff and directing the clerk aforesaid to allow costs of the action to the plaintiff and .disallowing the costs of the action to defendant, and why the judgment entered herein on May 15, 1911, should not be amended by striking out therefrom the costs allowed the defendant as…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Burns v. . D., L. W.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Dougherty v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  3. Kalt v. LignotNew York Supreme Court · 1856
  4. Moosbrugger v. KaufmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  5. Thayer v. HollandNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1882

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ballard Transfer & Storage Co. v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  2. Graybill v. Van DyneNew York Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Stahl v. Erie Delivery Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Jefferson County1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API