People v. Gross

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: On this appeal from a judgment convicting him of two counts of endangering the welfare of a child (Penal Law § 260.10 [1]), defendant contends that the jury verdicts are repugnant. That contention, however, has not been preserved because it was not raised prior to the discharge of the jury (see, People v Satloff, 56 NY2d 745, 746; People v Paz, 159 AD2d 987, 988, lv denied 76 NY2d 793; People v Carey, 151 AD2d 989, lv denied 74 NY2d 806). In any event, that contention lacks merit because defendant’s acquittal on the two counts of sexual abuse in the…