Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Skinner

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 19, 1990No. 8911SC684PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*6ARNOLD, Judge.

Defendants’ first two assignments of error concern the liability of Green and Toyota based on their violation of a statute. The parties stipulated that defendant Skinner had been negligent in his operation of the automobile. Concerning the liability of Green and Toyota, the case went to the jury based on an alleged violation of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 20-79(d) (1987), which at the time of the accident provided:

No manufacturer or dealer in motor vehicles, trailers or semitrailers shall cause or permit any such vehicle owned by such person or by any person in his employ, which is in the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hairston v. Alexander Tank & Equipment Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  2. Harton v. . Telephone Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  3. Conley Ex Rel. Conley v. Pearce-Young-Angel Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  4. Pray v. Narragansett Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1981
  5. Williams v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. McLeod v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  2. Little v. Omega Meats I, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  3. Daniels Ex Rel. Webb v. ReelCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  4. Carrier v. StarnesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  5. D'ALESSANDRO v. WestallDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API