Legal Opinion

State v. Lloyd

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 15, 1986No. 12238PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSantaniello, J.

The principal question raised in this appeal is when, and under what circumstances, a trial court must order a competency hearing before ruling on a motion to withdraw a guilty plea and before imposing sentence. On March 9, 1983, the defendant, Lawrence Lloyd, pleaded guilty to the crime of possession of cocaine with intent to sell, in violation of Gen*360eral Statutes (Rev. to 1981) § 19-480a. The trial court, after conducting an extensive canvass, accepted his plea. He was sentenced on May 6,1983, to twelve years imprisonment and was ordered to pay a $3000 fine. The defendant appeals, claiming…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Drope v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Sanders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. People v. PenningtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  2. State v. DeAngelisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  3. State v. WolffSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  4. State v. George B.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  5. State v. DesLaurierSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API