Legal Opinion

Lawver v. Lawvor

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 5, 1987No. 85-198-CV; CA A38109PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNewman, J.

This case is a companion to Lawver v. Beesley, 86 Or App 711, 740 P2d 1215 (1987), where we hold that the trial court should have granted plaintiffs’ petition to reopen the estate of Lucille Lawver, in order to allow them to contest her will. Plaintiffs appeal judgments in this action that dismissed their complaint against Beesley, Safeco Insurance Company of America (Safeco), and United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. (USF&G) (“defendants”), who were also respondents in the other action.

Plaintiffs’ complaint contains six claims. The first two are against Beesley only for declaratory relief;…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bonds v. LandersOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. O'Gara v. KaufmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  3. Tillamook County v. State Ex Rel. State Board of ForestryOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Lawver v. BeesleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Yanney v. KoehlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  2. Huang v. ClaussenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  3. Lawver v. BeesleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  4. Dotson v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  5. Dotson v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API