Dotson v. Smith
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1DissentVan Hoomissen, J.
I would hold that an ORCP 21A(9) motion to dismiss tests each claim in a complaint separately. Therefore, I respectfully dissent.
The rules of civil procedure allow plaintiffs to join claims against a number of parties and to assert alternative and even inconsistent claims. ORCP 24A; ORCP 16C. The majority holds that the trial court could look to plaintiffs claim against her former attorney to ascertain the facts in considering a motion to dismiss her claim against the other party. The majority’s holding penalizes plaintiff for joining claims that are not strictly factually inconsistent, but…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- O'Gara v. KaufmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- Industrial Underwriters, Inc. v. Jks, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- Lawver v. LawvorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
- Dryden v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
- Wagner v. Ryder Truck LinesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984