Legal Opinion

M. Groh's Sons v. Groh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 13, 1903PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from trial term, New York county. Action by M. Groh’s Sons against Julia A. Groh, executrix of John Groh. From a judgment in favor of defendant, and an order denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHatch, J.

This action was commenced against John Groh, and an answer was interposed by him. Pie died before the case came on for trial, his executrix was. substituted as defendant, and an amended answer was served by her. The plaintiff is a domestic corporation. Three separate causes of action are alleged in the complaint. In the first cause of action it is averred that M. Groh’s Sons prior to December 30, 1896, was a copartnership; that the defendant’s testator, John Groh, had charge of its cash, and between June 1, 1895, and December 30, 1896, received $7,175.02 belonging to said copartnership, which…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Turner v. . City of NewburghNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  2. Platner v. . PlatnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  3. Ward v. . KilpatrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  4. Atkins v. . ElwellNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  5. Hall v. Herter Bros.New York Supreme Court · 1894

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Smith v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1912
  2. Spencer v. LoweCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
  3. Barnes v. Spencer & Barnes Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1910
  4. In re Wilson's EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Central Trust Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1910

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API