Hall v. Herter Bros.
New York Supreme Court
Action by Edward Spencer Hall against Herter Bros, for money alleged to be due on contract. The complaint was dismissed, and plaintiff moves for a new trial on exceptions ordered to be heard at general term in the first instance.
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
The plaintiff, in January, 1890, made a contract with the firm of Herter Bros., under which he claims there is over $3,0,00 due; and this sum he says Herter Bros., a corporation, is legally bound to pay. William Baumgarten and William G. Nichols were for a number of years prior to the month of January, 1891, partners doing business under.the firm name of Herter Bros. During that month, Baumgarten and Nichols promoted a corporation under the name of Herter Bros., joining with themselves, as incorporators, a brother of Baumgarten, Nichols’ father, and Arthur Norton, their salesman. To this…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Sheridan Electric Light Co. v. Chatham Nat. BankNew York Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by15 opinions
- Smith v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1912
- Groh's Sons v. GrohAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
- Barkin Construction Co. v. . GoodmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Gerard v. Empire Square Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
- Ziemer v. C. G. Bretting Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.