Legal Opinion

State v. Shay

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1936No. 26013. Department TwoPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlake, J.

The defendants were jointly charged with the crime of grafting. From judgments and sentences entered on verdicts of guilty, they both appeal.

The following facts were established by evidence which is uncontroverted: March 21, 1935, a personal injury case, entitled “Ole Knutsen, Plaintiff, v. Guy N. Hudreen et ux., Defendants,” was on trial before a jury in one of the departments of the superior court of King county. Appellant Kinnear was a member of the jury.

About seven o’clock in the evening of March 21st, Shay appeared at the home of Elias A. Wright, attorney for the plaintiff in the case.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. LindenWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  2. State v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  3. State v. SheaWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  4. State v. MelsonWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Netherlands American Mortgage Bank v. GrafkeWashington Supreme Court · 1918

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. ClaytonWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  2. State v. IngelsWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  3. State v. LeuchWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  4. State v. SalleWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  5. State v. HusseyWashington Supreme Court · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API