State v. Johnson
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Snohomish county, Alston, J., entered June 9, 1917, upon a trial and conviction of violating the prohibition law.
1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.
— This case is a companion case and involves the same crime as.described in State v. Seablom, ante p. 53, 173 Pac. 721. It is complained that the confession of Johnson should not have been received. The only difference between the case of Seablom and appellant is that appellant says that the deputy prosecuting attorney said: “We have got you under a charge of burglary. You had. better tell something. You are trying to protect Wallin . . . You are getting in bad yourself.”
Appellant, requested the following instruction:
“You are instructed that no officer or person having the custody and control…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. BaileyWashington Supreme Court · 1903
- State v. MeyerkampWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Cranford v. O'SheaWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- State v. JohnstonWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- State v. ReganWashington Supreme Court · 1894
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. CaseWashington Supreme Court · 1956
- State v. LeuchWashington Supreme Court · 1939
- State v. MelsonWashington Supreme Court · 1936
- State v. StevensWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- State v. LindseyWashington Supreme Court · 1937
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.