Legal Opinion

State v. Salle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 1949No. 30830PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.

Defendant was charged, in each of three counts of an amended information, with the crime of grand larceny. The jury before which he was tried returned verdicts of guilty upon the first and third counts, and a verdict of not guilty upon the second count. From the judgment of conviction and sentence upon the two verdicts of guilty, defendant appealed.

All of the evidence in the case was adduced by the state, and the facts established thereby, as the jury could have found them, are substantially as we shall here relate them.

First, with respect to count one: On or about December 31, 1947, a…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Kirby v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Wertheimer & Goldberg v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1929
  3. State v. LindenWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  4. State v. HusseyWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Yeargain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1935

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Wright v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1954
  2. Boulden v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
  3. State v. LyskoskiWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  4. State v. DevinWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. DevinWashington Supreme Court · 2006

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API