Legal Opinion

Hardingham v. United Counseling Service

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided September 1, 1995No. 94-096PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.

Plaintiff David Hardingham, who was blinded as the result of drinking windshield wiper fluid during an alcoholic binge, appeals the superior court’s orders granting summary judgment in favor of defendants, whom plaintiff accused of negligently assisting him while he was intoxicated. We resolve all issues raised on appeal except for the issue of whether the superior court erred in ruling that, as a matter of law, defendants’ conduct did not amount to gross negligence. The four-member panel is equally divided on that issue, and it must be reargued before a full court.

I

In January 1991, plaintiff…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Fitzgerald v. CongletonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  2. Jackson v. Mercy Health Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  3. Mallory v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Clayton v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  5. Tatum v. GigliottiCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hardingham v. United Counseling Service of Bennington County, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1995
  2. Hardingham v. UNITED COUNSELLING SERVICESupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
  3. Kennery v. StateVermont Superior Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API