Legal Opinion

Jones v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 5, 1977No. 1 CA-IC 1454PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FROEB, Chief Judge.

This review questions the denial by the Industrial Commission (Commission) of a petition for commutation of compensation to lump sum award authorized by A.R.S. § 23-1067. Review of a denial of such an award would, under ordinary circumstances, be limited to a determination of whether the Commission abused its discretion. Prigosin v. Industrial Commission, 113 Ariz. 87, 546 P.2d 823 (1976). Petitioner’s contention is that, in this case, instead of exercising its discretion as to whether the lump sum commutation would have been in the best interest of petitioner, the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brigham Young University v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Prigosin v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Gray v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
  4. Gray v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Travelers Insurance Co. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lane v. Levi Strauss & Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Pacific Western Construction Co. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  4. Holsum Bakery v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  5. Rabago v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF ARIZ.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API