Rifkin Textiles Corp. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Dissent
DISSENTING OPINION
Ford, Judge:
This decision is one of the first promulgated by the court under the new Tariff Schedules of the United States and, consequently, there is no case law controlling the statutory language involved herein. I would, based upon the record, samples, and basic principles of law formulated over the years in the field of customs jurisprudence, sustain the protest.
The new language involved, as claimed by plaintiff, provides for “ornamented fabric.” A definition of the term “ornamented” is contained in the headnotes and provides as follows:
3. For the purposes of the tariff…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Merritt v. WelshSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Seeberger v. FarwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Lang v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1920