Lang v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 8298 (T. D. 38176). [Oral argument Mar. 25, 1920, by Mr. Gerry and Mr. Baldwin.1 [Oral reargumont Oet. 27, 1920, by Mr. Gerry and Mr. Baldwin.]
1Opinion of the CourtDe Vries, Judge
This appeal concerns certain importations of a metallic composition from Mexico entered at the port of El Paso, United States. The importations were of so-called “matte” varying in quantitative percentages of copper content from 22 to 52 per cent and in similar lead content from 17 to 57 per cent. Some contained gold, silver, platinum, or iridium. In each and all 'the copper was greater in value than the lead content. They were all classified for duty purposes by the collector of customs at the port of El Paso, except that covered by protest 809116, as “lead in any form” under paragraph 153…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Merritt v. WelshSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- United States v. American Smelting & Refining Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
- United States v. Consolidated Kansas City Smelting & Refining Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917
- Spencer v. Philadelphia Smelting & Refining Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Colorado · 1899
3Cited by7 opinions
- Michaelian & Kohlberg, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1935
- Northern Steamship Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
- R. C. Williams & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
- Rifkin Textiles Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
- United States v. Ayrton Metal Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.