Legal Opinion

Southern States Oil Co. v. Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey

District Court, E.D. North Carolina

Decided February 25, 1939No. 4162PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MYERS, District Judge.

This matter--comes before me upon the plaintiff’s motion to dismiss this action for want of jurisdiction to hear and determine the same. The ground upon which the motion is based is the contention that the State court was without jurisdiction of the cause, and therefore that, after removal, this court is without jurisdiction. The motion is based upon the wording of the complaint, and to a construction of that wording the arguments of counsel for both sides have been addressed.

The plaintiff, in filing the notice of this motion, attached thereto a statement of the motion…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. American Well Works Company v. Layne and Bowler CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Lambert Run Coal Co. v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. General Investment Co. v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. New York Central Railroad v. New York & Pennsylvania Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. Hand v. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bee Machine Co. v. FreemanDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1942
  2. Caraway v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API