Legal Opinion

State v. Freeney

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 1, 2009No. 1 CA-CR 07-0448PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WINTHROP, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 Mark Allen Freeney (“Appellant”) appeals from his conviction and sentence for aggravated assault. He contends that his conviction should be vacated because the trial court violated his Sixth Anendment right to notice in allowing the State to amend the indictment before jury voir- dire on the first day of trial, changing the theory of the underlying assault from “[ijntentionally placing another person in reasonable apprehension of imminent physical injury” to “Lijntentionally, knowingly or recklessly causing any physical injury to another person.” For the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. HendersonArizona Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. GreeneArizona Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. ValdezArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  5. State v. SustaitaArizona Supreme Court · 1978

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. FreeneyArizona Supreme Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API