Legal Opinion

United States v. Cone

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 24, 2017No. 16-5125PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARTZ, Circuit Judge.

Defendant John Eldridge Cone pleaded guilty to possession of controlled substances with intent to distribute. See 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(C). But he reserved the right to appeal the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress the evidence seized from his car by a police officer during a traffic stop. His sole argument on appeal is that the officer exceeded the Fourth Amendment bounds of the stop by asking him about his criminal history and travel plans. Exercising jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we affirm.

The proper scope of a traffic stop includes…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Rodriguez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  2. Hudson v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial Dist. Court of Nev., Humboldt Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. United States v. Dennis Dayton HoltCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
  5. United States v. Michael PalmerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. GainesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
  2. State v. JimenezSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
  3. United States v. Reyes-MorenoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
  4. United States v. MayvilleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
  5. United States v. Gomez-ArzateCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API