Legal Opinion
Phelps v. Hamilton
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided April 16, 1996No. 93-4042-KHVPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
VRATIL, District Judge.
The Court now considers Plaintiff’s Motion For Leave To File and Proceed on First Amended Complaint (Doc. # 85), filed January 16, 1996. For the reasons stated in this memorandum and order, plaintiffs motion for leave to amend is denied.
Rule 15(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil procedure governs the amendment of pleadings. Because of the advanced stage of the litigation in the instant case, the second sentence of Rule 15(a) applies, which contemplates that “a party may amend the party’s pleading only by leave of court or by written consent of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Golden v. ZwicklerSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Robert H. E. Frank, Jerry D. Mooberry, Tyrone G. Moreno v. U.S. West, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Jim L. Woolsey v. Marion Laboratories, Inc. Marion Laboratories, Inc., Profit Sharing PlanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Panis v. Mission Hills Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- State Distributors, Inc. v. Glenmore Distilleries Company and Foreign Vintages, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Xiangyuan (Sue) Zhu v. Countrywide Realty, Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 2001
- Steinert v. Winn Group, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2000
- Emily Dehn v. Board of Regents for Kansas Colleges and Universities, State of Kansas ex rel. University of KansasDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2026