Legal Opinion
Steinert v. Winn Group, Inc.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided January 3, 2000No. Civ.A. 98-2564-CMPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MURGUIA, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is plaintiffs Motion for Leave to Amend (Doc. 64) filed October 22, 1999. The Court considers this matter ready for ruling, as the time in which plaintiff could have filed a reply has now passed without comment from plaintiff.1 In his motion, plaintiff requests the Court for leave to amend his complaint by adding four new causes of action against the current defendants: (1) conspiracy to violate the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. (Count X); (2) FLSA retaliation, 29 U.S.C. § 215(a)(3) (Count X); (3)…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Robert H. E. Frank, Jerry D. Mooberry, Tyrone G. Moreno v. U.S. West, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Jim L. Woolsey v. Marion Laboratories, Inc. Marion Laboratories, Inc., Profit Sharing PlanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Equifax Services, Inc., D/B/A Equifax Commercial Specialists F/k/a White & White Inspection and Audit Service, Inc. v. Steven A. HitzCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Panis v. Mission Hills Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Acker v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 2003
- Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc. v. Torchmark Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 2004
- Gulf Coast Bank & Trust Co. v. Mendel (In Re Mendel)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2006
- Momswin, LLC v. LutesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2002
- Fefer v. Swift Transportation Company of Arizona, LLCDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2020
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.