Legal Opinion

Trenton v. Howell

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided July 30, 1942No. Docket 138/261PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On March 7th, 1941, the City of Trenton, possessing a tax sale certificate, filed a bill to foreclose the equity of redemption of those having an interest or estate in the premises described in the certificate. The City presumably acquired the fee by virtue of a final decree made in that cause on September 23d 1941. The City thereafter entertaining the assumption that it had neglected to include as defendants in the foreclosure suit the personal representatives of one Maggie M. Howell who held a mortgage encumbrance upon a portion of the premises embraced by the certificate, instituted the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Buchanan v. BuchananSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1909
  2. Matthews v. HoaglandNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1891
  3. Vaiden v. EdsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1915
  4. Hatt v. RichNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1900
  5. Dunham v. DoremusNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1897

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Phair v. Federal Deposit Ins. CorporationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1947
  2. Cona v. GowerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
  3. McTamney v. McTamneyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1946
  4. Kerlin v. MaherNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API