Legal Opinion
McTamney v. McTamney
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Decided April 11, 1946No. Docket 148/687PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The bill of complaint in its relation to the defendant James J. Hill has been voluntarily dismissed. The complainant now seeks an order striking out the answer and counter-claim filed by the defendant Christopher J. McTamney.
In her bill, the complainant declares that her mother died intestate on August 20th, 1931, seized in fee-simple of a parcel of real estate situate on the westerly side of Lamberton Street in the City of Trenton. Surviving her were her husband and seven heirs-at-law including the complainant. The husband of the deceased continued to occupy or to receive the entire income…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Buchanan v. BuchananSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1909
- In Re CalefNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1931
- Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Co. v. HarloffNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943
- State v. ReadySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1910
- Rusling v. RuslingSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1883
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Egner v. EgnerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
- Ratti v. RattiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
- Kerlin v. MaherNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947
- In Re Estate of BernsteinCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2011
- Allen v. GidneyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.