Legal Opinion
Claim of Martin v. Bausch & Lomb, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 4, 1976PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, filed February 14, 1975, which discharged the Special Fund for Reopened Cases under section 25-a of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. On August 11, 1966 claimant sustained a compensable injury to her right hip. Her case was closed on February 27, 1969, and the last payment of compensation was made on March 6, 1969. Thereafter the board reopened the case on October 18, 1973, but it declined to apply the provisions of section 25-a of the Workmen’s Compensation Law, holding instead that reports of claimant’s physician filed on February…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Claim of Tripoli v. Crucible Steel Co. of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
- Claim of Tripoli v. Crucible Steel Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
- Pucser v. Allegheny Ludlum Steel Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
- MATTER OF AMMIRATA v. WeidyNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
- Claim of Zafuto v. Knowles-Fisher Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Harper v. NORTH MISSISSIPPI MEDICAL CTR.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1992
- Claim of Totino v. Helann Trucking Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Claim of Felder v. City of New York Traffic Law DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Claim of Linz v. Maine Endwell School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- ABC Manufacturing Corporation v. Martha Jane DoyleMississippi Supreme Court · 1997