Legal Opinion

Claim of Felder v. City of New York Traffic Law Department

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 18, 1985PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Casey, J.

The employer contends that the Special Fund for Reopened Cases should be responsible for any award in this case, which *967was reopened more than three years after the case was closed and more than seven years after the date of the injury (see, Workers’ Compensation Law § 25-a). The Workers’ Compensation Board rejected this contention, affirming a hearing officer’s decision which discharged the Special Fund. There must be an affirmance.

In discharging the Special Fund, the Board concluded that a prior application to reopen, filed in August 1976 and denied by a Board decision filed in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Claim of Martin v. Bausch & Lomb, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Claim of Klouse v. City of AlbanyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. Krajas v. Chevy Pontiac Canada GroupAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. Nasner v. C.T. Brickman & Associates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API