Legal Opinion

Tootle-Campbell Dry Goods Co. v. Mounts

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 29, 1923No. 10451PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCochran, J.

This action was commenced by the defendants in error for the cancellation of certain notes and mortgages which had been executed to the plaintiff in error, Tootle-Campbell Dry Goods Company. The parties will hereinafter be referred to as plaintiffs and defendant as they appeared in the trial court.

The plaintiffs admitted the execution of the notes and mortgages, but alleged that they had been fully paid. Defendant, Tootle-Campbell Dry Goods Company, denied that the indebtedness represented by the notes and mortgages had been paid' in full, but admitted that the notes were en-tiled to certain…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brown v. CoppadgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Thrasher v. St. Louis & S. F. R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  3. Gypsy Oil Co. v. GinnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Landess v. State Ex Rel. Commissioners of the Land OfficeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  2. Clifford v. United States F. & G. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. Fooshee v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  4. Powell v. KightlingerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API