Legal Opinion

In re Terry D.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 10, 1993PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, without costs, appellants’ cross motion to quash granted, and the certified question answered in the negative.

The juvenile delinquency petition and underlying complaint allege that on September 18, 1990, respondent Terry D., then one week shy of his 16th birthday, entered a classroom at Brandéis High School in Manhattan, cursed the teacher, blocked her exit and punched her in the head. Respondent was charged with various acts of juvenile delinquency.

At respondent’s request, a Family Court Judge issued a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. People v. GissendannerNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. People v. VilardiNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Matter of Spector v. AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Pirro v. LaCavaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. Velez v. Hunts Point Multi-Service Center, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. People v. Michael M.New York Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Mestel & Co. v. Smythe Masterson & Judd, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  5. American Express Property Casualty Co. v. VinciAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API