Legal Opinion

Otto v. Wright Cnty.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 18, 2018No. A16-1634PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

GILDEA, Chief Justice.

In 2015, a new statute was enacted that governs the State Auditor's responsibilities over audits of Minnesota counties. The new statute allows counties to "choose to have the [required] audit" performed by either a Certified Public Accounting (CPA) firm or the State Auditor. Minn. Stat. § 6.481, subd. 2 (2016). The State Auditor contends that the new statute violates the Separation of Powers Clause, Minn. Const. art. III, § 1, and the Single Subject Clause, Minn. Const. art. IV, § 17. The district court held that the legislative modification of the State Auditor's duties…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Johnson v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  2. State v. MerrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  3. Marriage of Holmberg v. HolmbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  4. Associated Builders & Contractors v. VenturaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  5. State Ex Rel. Mattson v. KiedrowskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fletcher Props., Inc. v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API